I have spent the past few days furiously working on an uni assignment, another labourious essay. I am now at that stage where I have written all the words but transgressed so far off topic that I don't know what my original point was anymore, or if it was even valid to begin with.
Sigh. It seems I get to this point every single time I write an essay. In fact, I have written whole essays in the past and handed them in without ever having truly understood what I was writing about. To this day, I can't really explain agency theory but I did get a distinction on my essay for it. The art of bullshitting, that's what it's all about.
My problem with this assignment is that all the readings are by philosophers and all they talk about are theories and boring people like Kant and Rawls - trust me, you don't want to know. I doubt many politicians sit around thinking, What would Kant have done in my place? Shall we adopt the utilitarianism theory or the precautionary principle? Oh, I just don't know!
It's all very abstract and tedious, as you can imagine. Oh, and did I mention I have to get it in by tomorrow morning? No... this is already the end of my extension. Damn.
I have about three subjects left on my masters and the end seems so close. But I will be limping over the finish line.
The subject itself is interesting, at least I think so. What do we owe future generations? All about ethics and living life responsibly and all that. This I say as I type into my technologically advanced computer, powered by coal-fired electricity or whatever finite resource Santiago gets its energy from, perhaps by damming those pristine rivers down in Patagonia.
Note the sarcasm here.
Well, of course the main thing we owe future generations is a nice clean world to live in, one that hasn't been ravaged by climate change. And while individual actions like switching off lights, recycling and using a bike instead of a car give a nice, rosy glow of doing 'your part', in reality it doesn't make the slightest whiff of difference. Sorry. But it doesn't.
What matters are governments choosing to invest massively in green energy instead of coal, developing self-reliance in agriculture and industry so we're not importing (and transporting) heaps of things from abroad, to stop chopping down trees, and save the fish in the oceans...
And governments do have heaps of power to do stuff like this but it's all tied up in vested interests and lobby groups and short political cycles and a pesky opposition party that whinges about the government's every move.
But if you want people to care about the future, en masse, there need to be incentives and means to do so that people don't feel like they're making huge sacrifices. Because who wants to do that for a bunch of strangers living 300 years from now? Guilt is not an inspiring emotion. So, the choices need to exist so that people can feel they're doing something about climate change, and consequentially, the world, and then they'll feel more benevolent towards the future.
For example, the option of switching to green energy instead of coal for your home electricity. Personally, I'd pay a bit more to do that, maybe not a huge amount but a bit more. I think Canberra does offer green energy options now. But how many other places do? And how many people even know these choices are available to them? And the government should provide decent subsidies to people who want to install solar panels or a water tank or whatever in their own houses because those things aren't cheap. But if your own government is treading water over the problem, you're kind of stuffed aren't you?
If you've followed through this past rambling, you're probably doing better than my professor will, poor fellow. A quality 329 words above, only 3,171 to go. It's going to be a long night.
And let's close with a cute picture of a polar bear. Silly, bugger, how'd he get himself perched up there? Not too bright, bless.